MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of Critical Residues of the Granzyme B Inhibitor, Serpina3n (50.43)

2009· article· en· W2281269448 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelo Marcet Palacios, Chris Bleackley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranzyme BMutantGamma-ray burstBiologyCytotoxic T cellIn vitroChemistryMolecular biologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Granzyme B (GrB) is crucial for the immune system in eliminating tumor and virus-infected cells by caspase-mediated apoptosis. GrB also has detrimental effects in allograft tissue rejection and autoimmune diseases. Our aim was to design effective GrB inhibitors as unique immunosuppressive drugs in treating these disorders. Our lab has defined a novel murine inhibitor of GrB named serpina3n (ser3n). Ser3n is a superior candidate for drug design since it is the only known GrB inhibitor that is secreted extracellularly, making it more plasma stable. We performed scanning mutagenesis of the reactive centre loop (RCL) domain, which confers serpins with their protease specificity, to test which residues have inhibitory properties. Using an in vitro transcribed/translated (IVTT) ser3n protein, we found that the putative P1 residue (Met) and the P3’ residue (Lys) are important for ser3n binding to GrB. Human antichymotrypsin (ACT) is highly homologous to ser3n, but is not a GrB inhibitor. Our goal was to generate a human secretory protein that inhibits GrB. We created an ACT-ser3n chimera by replacing the RCL of ACT with that of ser3n. We then created a mutant ACT-ser3n chimera with a Met-to-Asp mutation that resulted in greater GrB binding than the original chimera, to a degree equal to ser3n binding. This inhibitor will work on pathogenic states when secreted GrB is important. This reveals a potential drug for blocking GrB in autoimmune diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207