MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2281870916 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.255

P1‐058: Genome‐wide association study in PET imaging longitudinal data

2015· article· en· W2281870916 on OpenAlexaff
Andréa Lessa Benedet, Aurélie Labbe, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Sara Mohades, Sarinporn Manitsirikul, Monica Shin, Chang Oh Chung, Tharick A. Pascoal, Seqian Wang, Thomas Beaudry, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsTranslational Research in OncologyMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyBonferroni correctionGenetic associationNeuroimagingEndophenotypePositron emission tomographyDiseaseSingle-nucleotide polymorphismMultiple comparisons problemAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMedicineOncologyBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsGenotypeGeneAlzheimer's diseaseNeuroscienceNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex disease in which the quest for causative genes has been challenging. In this search, genome-wide studies (GWAS) have been a valuable tool, being able to investigate, through thousands of markers, associations with the disease or with its endophenotypes. However, GWAS analyses almost always use cross-sectional data. Despite the adversities of obtaining and analyzing longitudinal data, the information about the disease progress can be of great importance. For this reason, we have searched for genetic markers associated with changes in brain amyloid (Aβ) load and glucose uptake. [F]Florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was employed to assess brain Aβ levels in 412 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, whilst glucose uptake was measured using [F]fludeoxyglucose PET (FDG) in 419 subjects from the same cohort. The genotypes were obtained with IlluminaHumanOmni2.5 beadchip. After quality control in both imaging and genetic data, a GWAS was performed. The phenotypes used were the differences between global SUVR in the baseline and 24 months follow-up of [F]florbetapir and FDG. Covariates as diagnostic status and baseline SUVR were added in the genetic analysis. The Bonferroni threshold of genome-wide significance is 3.9x10. Values higher then 3.9x10 but less then 10were considered trends of association. None of the SNPs reached genome-wide significance, however trends of association are reported here (Figure 1). Aβ accumulation shows a trend with 24 markers from 15 genes, in which probably the most relevant, and significant, is PLCH1. Brain hipometabolism indicate trend associations with 21 markers from 8 genes. The genes TTC39B and NRP1were the most significant. A) Quantile-quantile plot of [F]florbetabir GWAS. B) Manhattan plot [F]florbetabir GWAS. Red line represents the trend threshold of significance. C) Quantile-quantile plot of FDG GWAS. D) Manhattan plot FDG GWAS. Red line represents the trend threshold of significance. The major genes reported to be associated with AD were not found in the present study. Interestingly, Aβ accumulation seems to be related to the PLCH1 gene, which encodes for a phospholipase-C family-member. Phospholipases are important enzymes with key roles in cell signaling. Another relevant result may be the association of hypometabolism with the TTC39B gene. Its function is not clear, however this gene has been related to lipid metabolism. Further studies with bigger sample size would be necessary to confirm present results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicFolate and B Vitamins Research→French-language works237,207→