MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281891864 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab236

236 SUPEROVULATION IN SHEEP WITH REDUCED INJECTION FSH/eCG PROTOCOLS FOLLOWED BY TRANSFER OF FRESH OR VITRIFIED EMBRYOS

2015· article· en· W2281891864 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. C. Fry, R. Mapletroft, G. A. Bó, MM Izzo, M Humphris

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalineEmbryoEmbryo transferAndrologyPhysiological salineInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyAnimal scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this experiment was to compare a single FSH/eCG, or double FSH-0.5% hyaluronan/eCG injection protocol with a multiple FSH/eCG injection protocol on the superovulatory response and embryo production in sheep. In addition, the effect of vitrification of these embryos on the pregnancy rate following embryo transfer was evaluated. Eighty Dohne Merino ewes received an 8-day CIDR-S device (0.33 g P4; Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ, USA) plus 10 mg of FSH i.m. (Folltropin-V; Vetoquinol, Lavaltrie, QC, Canada) and 400 IU of eCG i.m. (Pregnecol; Vetoquinol) in 3 treatment groups. Group 1 (n = 21) received a single 10-mg FSH injection in saline and 400 IU of eCG in saline 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal. Group 2 (n = 23) received 6.7 mg of FSH in hyaluronan (MAP-5, 50 mg; Vetoquinol) and 400 IU of eCG in saline 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal and 3.3 mg of FSH in hyaluronan 0.5 days before CIDR withdrawal. Group 3 (n = 36) received 7 injections (am, pm) of FSH in saline (2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.5, 1.0, 1.0, 0.5 mg) starting 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal and 400 IU of eCG in saline at the first injection. Ewes were inseminated with semen collected from 1 of 5 rams at 36 to 40 h after CIDR withdrawal. Donor ewes were slaughtered 6 days after AI (Day 0), CL were counted and ova/embryos were collected. Viable embryos were transferred in singles into Day 6 synchronised recipients as either fresh (n = 128) or following vitrification/thawing using the CVM (CryoLogic, Blackburn, VIC, Australia; n = 97; Fry et al. 2005 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 17, 243). Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound scanning on Day 45. Data for CL and transferable embryo were analysed by the Kruskall-Wallis test and differences between groups determined by the Dunn test. Data for pregnancy rates was compared by chi-squared analysis. The mean number of CL in Groups 2 and 3 were both significantly higher than that in Group 1 (12.3 and 12.0 v. 8.5; P < 0.05). Similarly, the total number of embryos/ova recovered in Groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than for Group 1 (8.3 and 7.0 v. 5.0; P < 0.05). Group 3 produced more viable embryos than either Group 2 or Group 1 (4.6 v. 2.7 and 2.1; P < 0.05); however, data were skewed by the extensive use of semen from one ram in Group 2 that had a low fertilization rate (28%). The transfer of vitrified/thawed embryos resulted a nonsignificant (P > 0.05) 10% decrease in pregnancy rate compared with fresh embryos (66% v. 76%). In conclusion, the administration of the sustained release FSH-MAP-5 in a 2-injection protocol in sheep was as effective as a multiple FSH injection protocol in inducing an ovarian response but more research is required to elucidate the effect of FSH-MAP-5 on embryo quality. The successful vitrification of sheep embryos provides a promising technique for the storage and transport of embryos in large-scale sheep embryo transfer programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207