MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2281913649

Indigenous and settler identities: Beyond domination [Book Review]

2015· article· en· W2281913649 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Lawn

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand sociology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSociologyHybridityColonialismIdentity (music)RedressPoliticsAppropriationGender studiesAgency (philosophy)LawAestheticsPolitical scienceSocial scienceEpistemologyAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avril Bell (2014) Relating Indigenous and Settler Identities: Beyond Domination Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Reviewed by Jennifer LawnIn this clear-headed comparative study of the settler societies of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States, Avril Bell argues for the autonomy and inherent cultural agency of indigenous peoples as a foundation for transforming colonial relations. Settler domination continues to be secured through a set of common discursive manoeuvres - fantasies of unity, myths of origin, entrenched narratives of innocence, the appropriation of authenticity - by which settler cultures have sought to secure a distinct identity from the imperial centre and legitimate their habitation on indigenous territories. This settler social imaginary relies on dual identity categories of authenticity and hybridity, operating both as claims of settler uniqueness and as demands on indigenous peoples, who have, in turn, strategically reframed these terms for their own purposes. Ultimately, however, Bell sees such resistance strategies, important as they are, as entangling indigenous groups within debilitating settler preoccupations. Shifting emphasis from theories of identity to theories of intersubjectivity, Bell critically examines the politics of recognition as a major avenue of redress for colonial injustices, then proposes an alternative framework based on Levinasian ethics. The challenge for settler is to strip away presumptive authority and learn to live with multiple temporalities, multiple systems of governance, multiple networks of relationship between human and non-human spheres - not only when those systems can co-exist comfortably with western forms of knowledge, but also, and most emphatically, when they prove incompatible.Although much of this material is widely established in postcolonial discourse analysis, the issues and major contributions to the field are rarely set out so incisively, or with such careful balance between mapping the general pattern of settler colonial relations and attending to a range of local examples drawn evenly from across the CANZA states. Bell moves deftly between the work of core postcolonial theorists, representative examples, and individual voices and positions, managing salience and selection of material skilfully. Despite the breadth of coverage the discussion only rarely comes across as cursory, making Relating Indigenous and Settler Identities an invaluable resource in the field of settler studies and a useful text for postgraduate and upper-undergraduate level papers in identity and critical race studies.The introduction briskly justifies Bell's preferred approach and terminology. The term 'settler' is preferred over 'coloniser' or 'invader' because of its association with land and hence permanent habitation in, and appropriation of, the land. However, 'neither indigenous nor settler are wholly defined by the colonial relation' (7). The CANZA nation-states belong in a single comparative framework, Bell maintains, because they share a 'criterial commonality' (11) through similar phases of history: a period of war, physical violence and mass displacement; an extended attempt at assimilation; and, particularly in recent decades, a turn toward political recognition and accommodation, together with a rather free (that is, both presumptive and largely uncompensated) appropriation of indigenous symbolism as part of nationhood. Despite the tendency of its colonists to see themselves as an originary people, the United States is thus included alongside the non-revolutionary Anglophone nation states, which are more conventionally regarded as cultural derivatives of Britain.In addition to the premise of indigenous autonomy, Bell establishes two further core positions in the introduction. First, identity claims are inherently political, meaning that the forms in which claims are made will vary according to circumstance; but they are not arbitrary, in the sense that indigenous lifeworlds and knowledge systems remain, factually and foundationally, distinct from those of western cultural origins. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand sociologySame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207