MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282094049 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1500007

FLUORNATROPYROCHLORE, A NEW PYROCHLORE SUPERGROUP MINERAL FROM THE BOZIGUOER RARE EARTH ELEMENT DEPOSIT, BAICHENG COUNTY, AKESU, XINJIANG, CHINA

2015· article· en· W2282094049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jingwu Yin, Guowu Li, Guangming Yang, Xiangkun Ge, Haiming Xu, Jun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryMineralChinaSupergroupRare-earth elementMining engineeringRare earthMineralogyArchaeologyGeographyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluornatropyrochlore is a new pyrochlore supergroup mineral species found in the intrusive alkali granite of the Boziguoer rare earth element deposit in Baicheng County, Akesu, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, China. This new mineral is found to be closely associated with microcline, albite, aegirine, a sodic amphibole, biotite, zircon, rutile, thorite, fluorite, fluocerite-(Ce), columbite-(Fe), xenotime-(Y), astrophyllite, chevkinite-(Ce), and fergusonite-(Y). Fluornatropyrochlore occurs mostly as anhedral crystals, rarely as subhedral grains, with a grain size of 0.02 to 0.25 mm. The color is brownish yellow to reddish orange. Other physical properties are: brittle, translucent to transparent, non-fluorescent, adamantine luster, light yellow streak, with Mohs hardness 4–4½, and calculated density 5.275 g cm−3. Fluornatropyrochlore is isotropic, n = 2.10(5) (589.9 nm). It has a cubic crystal structure, with unit-cell parameters determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction as: a 10.5053(10) A, V 1159.4(2) A3, Z = 8, space group Fd 3 m . The strongest ten X-ray diffraction (XRD) peaks in the powder XRD pattern are [ d in A( I )( hkl )]: 6.0741(3)(111), 3.0416(100)(222), 2.6280(38)(004), 1.8568(34)(044), 1.5820(15)(226), 1.5148(4)(444), 1.3137(2)(008), 1.2045(3)(266), 1.1726(2)(048), and 1.0712(1)(448). Chemical analyses by a combination of electron microprobe, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and single crystal-structure refinement give its chemical composition as: Na2O 6.80, K2O 0.01, CaO 2.01, MgO 0.01, FeO 0.05, SrO 0.03, PbO 16.17, Ce2O3 4.29, La2O3 1.65, Nd2O3 0.41, Y2O3 0.42, SiO2 0.03, TiO2 1.36, UO2 5.81, Ta2O5 3.00, Nb2O5 53.42, F 3.19, Cl 0.02, ThO2, Sb2O5 0.01, ZrO2 0.01, MnO 0.04, SnO2 0.34, H2O not detected, with a sum of 98.21 wt.%. The empirical formula derived from its averaged composition is (Na1.03Pb0.34Ca0.17U0.10Th0.01Ce0.12La0.05Y0.02Nd0.01)Σ1.85(Nb1.88Ti0.08Ta0.06Sn0.01)Σ2.03O6.21F0.79 based on 7 anions per formula unit. The crystal structure was refined to an R index of 0.053 using Mo Ka X-ray intensity data. Site-scattering refinement analysis shows that the new mineral is characterized by F dominance at the Y site, Na dominance at the A site, and Nb dominance at the B site, based on the overall electroneutrality requirement of the structural formula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicNuclear materials and radiation effectsFrench-language works237,207