MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2282239472 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v60i3.174

Olanzapine-Induced Diabetic Ketoacidosis Resulting in Prolongation of Hospital Stay: Clinical Outcome and Cost Issues

2007· article· en· W2282239472 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Natalie Crown, Matthew Feltham, Charles D. Bayliff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOlanzapineDiabetic ketoacidosisQuetiapineDiabetes mellitusRisperidoneAdverse effectKetoacidosisClozapinePediatricsSexual dysfunctionAnesthesiaInternal medicineType 1 diabetesSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychiatryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION A typical antipsychotics are as effective as traditional antipsychotics in the treatment of chronic psychotic disorders and are associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms.1 Despite their lower propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms, these drugs are associated with other adverse effects, including anticholinergic effects, hypotension, sedation, sexual dysfunction, and weight gain.2 Endocrine disturbances such as hyperglycemia, new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus, and ketoacidosis have been associated with atypical antipsychotics, including olanzapine.3 Diabetic ketoacidosis is a serious, potentially lifethreatening metabolic complication of diabetes mellitus.4 Numerous cases of this adverse effect have been reported during treatment with clozapine and olanzapine, but fewer case reports have been published for risperidone and quetiapine.3 We report a case of prolonged hospital stay resulting from olanzapineinduced diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with no previous personal or family history of diabetes. This case illustrates the substantial morbidity associated with this adverse effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→