MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2282328813 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.awp378

Abstract WP378: Characteristics and Outcomes of Stroke Patients Transferred to Hospitals Participating in the Michigan Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry 2009-2011

2013· article· en· W2282328813 on OpenAlexaff
Stacey Roberts, Adrienne Nickels, Erin Shell, Marylou Mitchell, Syed Hussain, Mathew J. Reeves

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Logistic regressionEmergency medicineAcute strokeDeep veinThrombolysisInternal medicineThrombosisPediatricsMyocardial infarctionTissue plasminogen activator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characteristics and Outcomes of Stroke Patients Transferred to Hospitals Participating in the Michigan Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry, 2009-2011 Background: As stroke systems of care are evolving the number of stroke patients transferred between hospitals is increasing. Our objectives were to describe the characteristics of acute stroke patients who were transferred to hospitals participating in the Michigan Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry, and to determine the independent association between transfer status (TS) and in-hospital mortality (IHM) and in-hospital complications (IHC). Methods: From 2009-2011, 30934 acute ischemic (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS) patients were admitted to 35 registry hospitals. Patients with an in-hospital stroke, TIA, or unknown arrival mode were excluded (N= 14,732). Independent factors associated with TS and predictors of IHC (defined as deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, and/or UTI) were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: The mean age of the 16202 admissions was 69.2 years, 51% were female, 68% were white, 83% had an IS, 7.4% died in-hospital, and 13.8% had an IHC. Overall, 19% (N= 3091) were transferred to a registry hospital. The transfer rate increased from 2009-2011 (16.9% -21.1%), and was higher in HS vs. IS patients (37.6% vs. 15.3%). Significant predictors of TS were year, age, gender, race, stroke type, pre-stroke ambulatory status, nursing home residence, and medical history of diabetes or prior stroke. Length of stay (LOS) was longer for transferred patients vs. non-transferred (7.9 vs. 5.3 days, p<0.0001). Transferred patients were more likely to die in-hospital vs. non-transferred (12.0% vs. 6.4%, P <0.001), and develop IHC (18.4% vs. 12.8%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, TS remained a significant predictor of IHM (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.46, 95%CI =1.14- 1.88), and IHC (aOR= 1.58, 95%CI =1.34- 1.87). Conclusions: The frequency of hospital transfers increased markedly in this registry. Transferred patients experience higher rates of IHM, IHC and longer LOS. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between TS and outcomes and the implication for improved clinical care and reducing poor outcomes in this higher risk group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→