MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282338521 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.awp300

Left Ventricle Hypertrophy is Common in Patients with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Is Independently Associated with Long-Term Mortality.

2013· article· en· W2282338521 on OpenAlexaff
Octávio Marques Pontes‐Neto, Sergi Martínez‐Ramírez, Anand Viswanathan, Eitan Auriel, Kristen M Schwab, Alison Ayres, M. Edip Gurol, Jonathan Rosand, Steven M. Greenberg, Joshua N. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsTitan Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebral amyloid angiopathyIntracerebral hemorrhageProportional hazards modelInternal medicineCardiologyLeft ventricular hypertrophyStroke (engine)Single CenterPost-hoc analysisVentricleCohortConfoundingBlood pressureSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A post-hoc analysis of the PROGRESS trial suggested that long-term anti-hypertensive therapy prevents intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). However, the burden of underlying hypertension in patients with CAA is unclear, and it is also unclear whether this hypertensive burden contributes to long-term outcome in survivors of CAA-related ICH. Left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy is a measure of the chronicity and severity of hypertension and could be used to assess hypertensive end-organ damage in patients with CAA. Objective: To test the hypothesis that LV hypertrophy is common in patients with CAA-related ICH and is associated with increased long-term mortality and shorter survival in those patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of consecutive patients with primary ICH presenting to a single academic center. We included patients presenting between January/2000 to December/2010, age > 55 years, who received a transthoracic echocardiogram (echo) during follow-up and were diagnosed with definitive, probable or possible CAA according to the Boston criteria. LV mass index (10g/m2) was calculated according to Penn convention. Ninety-day survivors were followed prospectively for long-term mortality or censoring at January/2012. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of mortality as time-dependent variables adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Among 211 patients who met inclusion criteria, the mean time to follow-up was 4.28 ± 2.7 years; the median time to echocardiogram was 3 days (IQR:49). The mean age was 75.7 ± 9.1 years; 103 (49%) were male. LV hypertrophy was present in 55 (31.8%) patients and 152 (72%) patients survived more than 90 days. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for baseline characteristics, LV mass index (10g/m2) was associated with higher long-term mortality (HR: 1.20; 95%CI: 1.01-1.4; p=0.039). On Cox-regression, LV hypertrophy was independently associated with shorter long-term survival (HR 1.91; 95%CI 1.05-3.47; p=0.034). Conclusions: LV hypertrophy is common in patients with CAA-related ICH and is associated with increased risk of subsequent mortality among 90-day survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207