MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W228247187 · doi:10.21236/ada382147

FEDspresso - CAFDE Based HLA Federation Development and Implementation Tool Suite

2000· report· en· W228247187 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane T. Bachman, Stephen M. Goss, Paul Gustavson, Lawrence M. Root

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuiteComputer scienceRussian federationSoftware engineeringGeographyRegional scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Report developed under SBIR contract. During the Phase II effort, Synetics developed the OMSuite(TM) HLA Federation Development Tools - OMCase(TM), OMBuilder(TM), OMSpector(TM), OMLex(TM), OMNet(TM), and OMManager(TM). The OMSuite(TM) tool suite provides an integrated tool environment, connected via the Computer Aided Federation Development Environment (CAFDE) Engine allowing for the integration of third party components, support for on-line collaboration, and assistance in one or more aspects of federation engineering: requirements generation, federation construction, and execution transition. The major emphasis was placed on the development of OMCase(TM) for requirements capturing, OMBuilder(TM) for object modeling definition, and OMSpector(TM) for providing federation adaptability. The OMSuite(TM) tool suite has been sold to several U.S. companies and to the Canadian government. Additionally, OMSuite(TM) is being used in the development of the large-scale simulation at the TEAMs facility at NSWCDD, Dahlgren, Virginia. The Synetics OMSuite(TM) development team has also published and presented many papers for the Simulation Interoperability Workshops, contributed to refining of FEDEP processes, and assisted in leading the Base Object Models (BOMs) methodology effort within the SISO community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207