Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both the “Royal Commission on the Sinking of the Ocean Ranger” and the Piper Alpha Inquiry recommended that improvements be made to escape, evacuation and rescue (EER) systems employed on offshore petroleum facilities. The respective methodologies suggested for achieving these was by both the development of “performance standards” and the utilization of “goal-setting regulations”. A system now exists which meets the recommendations of both public inquiries. Following an extensive series of model testing at the Institute of Marine Dynamics in St. John’s, a full operating system was installed at the Humberside Offshore Training Association (HOTA) located in Kingston-upon- Hull, United Kingdom. A total of 267 trials with resulting data gave evidence to the effective availability of this unique system. A second system of a more advanced configuration is currently under construction. It is to be placed at the mouth of St. John’s harbour on the east coast of Newfoundland, Canada in March 2003. Complete with the newly constructed Life-Rescue Craft, the Seascape System of Evacuation will undergo a series of rigorous trials in seas up to and including Beaufort 8. Launches will, also, be made into a combination of 1st year and multi-year ice, which is present in early spring. The Life-Rescue Craft launched in February 2002 was dispatched to the northeast coast of Newfoundland in mid-April, 2002 where it was subjected to a rigorous series of ice-trials. A second set of trials in harbour/sheet ice took place between March 1-5, 2003. This major research & development is being carried out as a multi-national joint industry/government project (JIP) involving regulators from several jurisdictions and a consortium of major operators. The project is to conclude in March/April 2004.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".