MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interaction of scleraxis and Smad‐dependent cardiac collagen expression

2011· article· en· W2282684582 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rushita A. Bagchi, Ian Dixon, Michael P. Czubryt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTransactivationSMADCardiac fibrosisTransforming growth factorChemistryMolecular biologyCell biologyTranscription factorBiologyFibrosisMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deposition of type I collagen is a hallmark of cardiac fibrosis. We have shown that the transcription factor scleraxis (Scx) is expressed in cardiac fibroblasts and is sufficient to regulate human collagen Iα2 (COLIα2) expression. Our objective was to study Scx interaction with the fibrotic Smad signalling pathway. We identified specific E box sites within the COLIα2 proximal promoter mediating transactivation by Scx. TGF-β1 augmented transactivation of the promoter by Scx, suggesting an additive effect of Scx with TGF-β1 signalling pathways. Inhibitory Smad7 partially blunted Scx-mediated COLIα2 promoter activation. Receptor Smad3 up-regulated whereas Smad7 down-regulated Scx expression in primary rat cardiac fibroblasts, suggesting cross-talk between Scx and Smad-mediated COLIα2 expression mechanisms. A dominant-negative Scx mutant abrogated COLIα2 promoter transactivation by TGF-β1, suggesting that interference with Scx function is sufficient to block pro-fibrotic signalling. We noted elevated Scx expression in the pressure-overloaded murine heart following thoracic aortic banding concomitant with increased type I collagen expression. These results support our hypothesis that Scx regulates collagen synthesis and hence may be an important novel target for developing anti-fibrotic therapies. Supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research & St. Boniface Hospital Research Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207