How effective is efinaconazole in the management of onychomycosis?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Onychomycosis is a fungal nail infection that is difficult to treat due to poor accessibility of drugs into the nail plate. Although oral antifungals can reach the nail apparatus more readily, these therapies may not be suitable or desirable for some patients (e.g., multiple medications or immunocompromised). Efinaconazole 10% solution is a new topical antifungal recently approved and sold in Canada, the United States and Japan for the treatment of mild-to-moderate toenail onychomycosis. Efinaconazole has broad-spectrum antifungal activity against dermatophytes, nondermatophyte molds and yeasts, and high ungual penetration due to its low keratin binding properties. AREAS COVERED: The objective of this article is to summarize recent data regarding the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic properties of efinaconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis. EXPERT OPINION: Efinaconazole is a safe and effective treatment for onychomycosis that can be used in a wide range of patients due to its broad-spectrum antifungal activity and low rate of treatment-related adverse events. When incomplete response to oral therapy or devices (e.g. laser therapy) is encountered, efinaconazole could be used in combination to improve success rates. Alternatively, efinaconazole could be used as a 'closer' drug, in an effort to provide cure when the initial oral or device therapy has resulted in an incomplete response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".