Bolesna pamięć: Wysiedlenie i internowanie społeczności japońskiej w Kanadzie w czasie II wojny światowej
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Second World War was a significant and painful period in history of the Japanese Canadian community. The members of this community were suffering in Canada from grave discrimination before the war. They were despised and considered primitive, unable to assimilate for their different race and culture. The outbreak of the Pacific War only intensified the hostility towards people of Japanese origin. The suppressed prejudices coincided with the atmosphere of jeopardy on the West Coast, where people feared the invasion from the Japanese Empire. In the aftermath of the Pearl Harbor attack (December 7, 1941), over 21 thousand people of Japanese origin in Canada were deprived of their properties, evicted from the West Coast, and interned in relocation camps. Male evacuees were sent to road building projects (road camps). Women and children were placed in internment camps, officially called “relocation centers.” Moreover, approximately 750 men were detained in Prisoner of War (POW) camps in Angler and Petawawa, Ontario. Due to increasing demand for agricultural workers in the Prairie Provinces, some Japanese Canadian families were sent to sugar beet projects in Alberta and Manitoba. Following the war, Japanese Canadians were given a choice of being deported to Japan or moving themselves east of the Rockies. The objective of this paper is to present the Japanese Canadian experiences of displacement and incarceration during the Second World War, as well as to characterize the internment camps where they were placed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".