MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2282839539 · doi:10.2118/177982-ms

Chelating Agent for Uniform Filter Cake Removal in Horizontal and Multilateral Wells: Laboratory Analysis and Formation Damage Diagnosis

2015· article· en· W2282839539 on OpenAlexaff
Hussain Al-Ibrahim, Tariq Almubarak, Majed Almubarak, Peter Osode, Mohammed Bataweel, Abdullah Al-Yami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilter cakeDrilling fluidChelationFilter (signal processing)Petroleum engineeringDrillingChemistryMaterials scienceGeologyChemical engineeringChromatographyMetallurgyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An impermeable mud cake layer, created on the formation face while drilling may be favorable for drilling operations but detrimental to well productivity. In vertical high pressure wells the layer is cleaned out while flowing back the well at adequate pressure drawdown. On the other hand, low pressure differential at the sand face in horizontal wells makes well cleanup treatments a necessity. Not all filter cake components are acid soluble. Commonly used inorganic acids and oxidizers are very reactive and cause uneven filter cake removal, which can affect the well's performance. As a result, there was a need to evaluate slow-reacting chemicals that can produce delayed uniform filter cake removal in horizontal wells. These treatment chemicals vary from the nonreactive acid-free microemulsion fluid systems to the weak organic acids, acid precursors, enzymes and chelating agents. The objective of this paper is to evaluate two chelating agent based treatments, NTA and EDTA, as filter cake removal treatments for a sandstone reservoir utilizing oil based mud (OBM) drill-in fluid (DIF) in Saudi Arabia. Coreflooding experiments were run under reservoir conditions to evaluate fluid-rock interaction. In addition, fluid-fluid compatibility was conducted between chelating agent and drill-in fluids base brines and between the chelating agent and formation fluid using high temperature, high pressure (HTHP) see-through cell. Solubility and static fluid-loss tests were conducted to evaluate the filter cake removal efficiency. Experimental results indicated that the NTA-based treatment was effective in removing up to 91% of the filter cake uniformly after soaking treatment for 24 hours. Fluid-fluid compatibility tests showed that the NTA-based chelating agent, when mixed with reservoir fluids, was free from precipitation or emulsion. On the contrary, mixing the chelating agent with the DIF carrier brine resulted in severe precipitation of insoluble permanently damaging byproducts. The laboratory study also observed that pH has a direct proportional relationship with the amount of precipitation. EDTA-based treatment results showed a removal efficiency of 93% after soaking treatment for 90 hours. Fluid-fluid compatibility tests showed that the EDTA-based treatment, when mixed with OBM DIF was free from precipitation or emulsion. On the contrary, mixing the chelating agent with the reservoir formation water resulted in severe precipitation of insoluble permanently damaging byproducts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207