MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2282910134 · doi:10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.wmp38

Abstract W MP38: Resting-state Functional Connectivity after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2015· article· en· W2282910134 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Maher, Airton Leonardo de Oliveira Manoel, Simon J. Graham, R. Loch Macdonald, Tom A. Schweizer

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineResting state fMRIExecutive functionsFunctional magnetic resonance imagingSuperior frontal gyrusPrecuneusCognitionExecutive dysfunctionEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceNeuroscienceInferior frontal gyrusWorking memoryPrefrontal cortexAudiologyCardiologyPsychologyNeuropsychologyPsychiatryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Up to 83% of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) survivors experience cognitive deficits - particularly in the domain of executive functioning, which encompasses skills necessary for everyday functioning. The neural correlates of these deficits have not yet been investigated. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is an imaging technique to investigate functional connectivity between brain regions at rest - that is, without the use of a stimulation task. Spontaneous neural activity at rest is an intrinsic property of healthy brains and can be disrupted by various pathologies. In rs-fMRI, deviations from the norm (increases or decreases) are abnormalities indicative of the existence of impairments. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that aSAH patients will exhibit altered resting-state functional connectivity within frontal brain networks that would map onto impaired performance on tests of executive functioning relative to matched healthy controls. METHODS: 14 aSAH patients and 11 healthy controls matched on age, education and gender were included. To differentiate between patients with good and poor cognitive outcome, a composite Executive Function score was generated using the z-scores of executive tests, and patients with negative composites were then classified as ‘Impaired’ for further analyses. RESULTS: The Impaired group scored significantly worse than both Controls and Unimpaired patients on 10 measures of executive functioning. Resting-state connectivity between the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG) was significantly increased in the ‘Impaired’ patients and this connection covaried significantly with composite executive scores. Increased connectivity between the left DLPFC and right precuneus was seen in the impaired patients relative to controls, covarying significantly with reduced mood scores. CONCLUSIONS: The aberrant connection between the right DLPFC and left SFG may underlie executive impairments after aSAH. This imaging modality could be explored as a potential diagnostic tool to identify cognitive impairment in aSAH patients and direct them to appropriate rehabilitation programs for improved cognitive outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→