MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2283130070 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3652

Abstract 3652: Sex Differences in CD200 and CD200R1 Expression in the Brain Following Experimental Stroke

2012· article· en· W2283130070 on OpenAlexaff
Rodney M. Ritzel, Craig S. Moore, Louise D. McCullough

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaMedicineStroke (engine)InflammationReceptorInternal medicineNeuroscienceEndocrinologyCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose Emerging data suggests that stroke-induced inflammation significantly contributes to neuronal injury and clinical outcome. Local inflammatory responses following cerebral ischemia have highlighted a pivotal role for the innate immune system in the brain’s response to injury, including activation of microglia and macrophages. Cell-surface receptors (e.g. CD200R1) on microglia and other myeloid-derived cells directly interact with specific endogenous ligands (e.g. CD200) expressed on neurons and act to suppress pro-inflammatory signaling by maintaining microglia in an “inactive state”. Recent studies investigating the imbalance of CD200-CD200R1 signaling in models of neurodegenerative disease support the hypothesis that this interaction may also be disrupted following stroke. We investigated the role of the immune inhibitory receptor CD200R1, and its ligand, CD200, after experimental stroke in both male and female mice. Methods Gonadally intact male and female C57BL/6 mice were subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion by reversible right MCA occlusion for 90min followed by 6h of reperfusion. Brains were harvested and processed for RNA and protein. mRNA and protein were analyzed for CD200 and CD200R1 expression using qPCR and Western blotting respectively in both stroke and sham mice. Immunohistochemistry was performed to identify the cellular source of CD200 and CD200R1 expression. Results At 6h post-reperfusion, decreased CD200 gene expression was seen in both sexes compared to sham. Western blot analysis demonstrated that CD200 was significantly decreased in males compared to females after stroke. CD200R1 gene levels were also downregulated in males compared to sham, however expression levels in females were increased after stroke. A relative 4-fold increase in CD200R1 protein levels was seen in stroke males compared to sham, in contrast CD200R1 expression in females decreased following stroke. Conclusions Early in the post-ischemic period, a marked difference between males and females in both CD200 and CD200R1 expression was seen, suggesting sex-dependent modulation of the stroke-induced inflammatory response. The decrease in CD200 ligand expression in males following stroke would be expected to lead to decreased CD200R1 activation, freeing microglial inhibition, thereby promoting a pro-inflammatory response. The increase in CD200R1 expression following stroke in males may act as a compensatory mechanism, potentially serving to enhance CD200-CD200R1 interactions between neurons and myeloid cells and thus suppress inflammation. These results provide a novel explanation for the larger cerebral infarcts seen in males, by a mechanism whereby stroke-induced disruption of the immunosuppressant interaction between CD200 and CD200R1 leads to worse outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→