Results of a phase II study to evaluate the biological effects of intratumoral (ITu) reolysin in combination with low dose radiotherapy (RT) in patients (Pts) with advanced cancers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e14514 Background: Reolysin, a wild type reovirus serotype 3 Dearing strain, replicates preferentially in Ras-activated cancer cells. In vitro and in vivo data have shown that combining reolysin and radiation (RT) significantly increases RT-induced cytotoxicity. A completed phase I trial of ITu reolysin and RT demonstrated that the combination was well tolerated and resulted in local and systemic responses. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, multicenter Phase 2 study combined ITu reolysin with low-dose fractionated RT. 20 Gy was given in 5 consecutive daily 4 Gy fractions combined with 2 ITu injections of reolysin (1x1010 TCID50) on days 2 & 4. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response rate in treated lesions. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate: viral replication, immune response and safety. Pts with ECOG performance status ≤2, with refractory advanced or metastatic cancers were eligible. Results: 16 heavily pre-treated pts (9 male, median age 66 yrs, ECOG 0:4pts; 1:12pts) with advanced cancer: melanoma (5), colorectal (4), gastric (1), ovarian (1), pancreas (1), lung (1), cholangiocarcinoma (1), sinus (1), and thyroid (1) were enrolled since Dec 2006. Most pts had received prior chemotherapy (13 pts) or RT (5 pts). No related serious adverse effects were observed during the study. Toxicities related to treatment were Grade 1 or 2: chills, pyrexia, headache, lethargy, anorexia, vomiting, shivering, nausea, and mild injection site pain. Of 14 pts evaluable for response, 13 pts had stable disease or better in the treated target lesion. Of these, partial responses were observed in 4 pts (lung, melanoma x 2, gastric) and minor responses were observed in 2 pts (thyroid, ovarian). Antibody responses to reolysin were delayed compared to previous results with intravenous administration. Conclusions: The combination of ITu reolysin and low dose RT was well tolerated and resulted in marked responses or stabilization in the treated target lesions for most of the pts evaluated to date. Further study in the radical setting is warranted. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".