MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2283877740 · doi:10.14288/1.0096260

The development of a model for a multicultural preschool centre in British Columbia

2010· article· en· W2283877740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismPolitical scienceSociologyGeographyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is designed to provide a theoretical base for the development of a curriculum for a model multicultural preschool in Vancouver, British Columbia. The literature in cultural research and learning English as a second language is reviewed. Multicultural programs in the U.S.A. and Canada are investigated to gain information about curriculum specifically designed for children from different cultural backgrounds. The two formal research studies that were conducted in the first two years of the three year project are described. In the first year the relationship between social competency and the ability to speak English was investigated. Although there was no correlation between these two factors, the social strategies ESL children use to interact with each other in a multilingual/multicultural group are identified. The testing procedure used with ESL children to measure social competency and second language development is outlined. In the second year two preschool groups with high and low ability levels of English were presented with five typical preschool curriculum activities. Their responses to each of the five activites was compared. As a result of the comparison it became that certain curriculum activities need modification for multicultural preschool groups. The role of the teacher is carefully observed throughout the two years of the study. Strategies for teaching English as a second language and fostering cultural adjustment in ESL children are identified. In conclusion recommendations are discussed for program planning, fostering the retention of first language and culture, developing cultural awareness and teaching English as a second language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesFrench-language works237,207