MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284120322 · doi:10.1113/jp272012

Carbon dioxide‐mediated vasomotion of extra‐cranial cerebral arteries in humans: a role for prostaglandins?

2016· article· en· W2284120322 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan L. Hoiland, Michael M. Tymko, Anthony R. Bain, Kevin W. Wildfong, Brad Monteleone, Philip N. Ainslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasomotionHypocapniaHypercapniaAnesthesiaInternal carotid arteryCerebral blood flowCyclooxygenaseMedicineCerebral arteriesInternal medicineVasodilationChemistryAcidosisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: Cerebral blood flow increases during hypercapnia and decreases during hypocapnia; it is unknown if vasomotion of the internal carotid artery is implicated in these responses. Indomethacin, a non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor (used to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis), has a unique ability to blunt cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity, while other cyclooxygenase inhibitors have no effect. We show significant dilatation and constriction of the internal carotid artery during hypercapnia and hypocapnia, respectively. Indomethacin, but not ketorolac or naproxen, reduced the dilatatory response of the internal carotid artery to hypercapnia The differential effect of indomethacin compared to ketorolac and naproxen suggests that indomethacin inhibits vasomotion of the internal carotid artery independent of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition. ABSTRACT: Extra-cranial cerebral blood vessels are implicated in the regulation of cerebral blood flow during changes in arterial CO2 ; however, the mechanisms governing CO2 -mediated vasomotion of these vessels in humans remain unclear. We determined if cyclooxygenase inhibition with indomethacin (INDO) reduces the vasomotor response of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to changes in end-tidal CO2 (P ETC O2). Using a randomized single-blinded placebo-controlled study, participants (n = 10) were tested on two occasions, before and 90 min following oral INDO (1.2 mg kg(-1) ) or placebo. Concurrent measurements of beat-by-beat velocity, diameter and blood flow of the ICA were made at rest and during steady-state stages (4 min) of iso-oxic hypercapnia (+3, +6, +9 mmHg P ETC O2) and hypocapnia (-3, -6, -9 mmHg P ETC O2). To examine if INDO affects ICA vasomotion independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition, two participant subsets (each n = 5) were tested before and following oral ketorolac (post 45 min, 0.25 mg kg(-1) ) or naproxen (post 90 min, 4.2 mg kg(-1) ). During pre-drug testing in the INDO trial, the ICA dilatated during hypercapnia at +6 mmHg (4.72 ± 0.45 vs. 4.95 ± 0.51 mm; P < 0.001) and +9 mmHg (4.72 ± 0.45 mm vs. 5.12 ± 0.47 mm; P < 0.001), and constricted during hypocapnia at -6 mmHg (4.95 ± 0.33 vs. 4.88 ± 0.27 mm; P < 0.05) and -9 mmHg (4.95 ± 0.33 vs. 4.82 ± 0.27 mm; P < 0.001). Following INDO, vasomotor responsiveness of the ICA to hypercapnia was reduced by 67 ± 28% (0.045 ± 0.015 vs. 0.015 ± 0.012 mm mmHg P ETC O2(-1) ). There was no effect of the drug in the ketorolac and naproxen trials. We conclude that: (1) INDO markedly reduces the vasomotor response of the ICA to changes in P ETC O2; and (2) INDO may be reducing CO2 -mediated vasomotion via a mechanism(s) independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207