MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284223602 · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0044

Thermodynamic temperature assignment to the point of inflection of the melting curve of high-temperature fixed points

2016· article· en· W2284223602 on OpenAlexafffund
Emma Woolliams, K. Anhalt, M. J. Ballico, P. Bloembergen, F. Bourson, S. Briaudeau, Joaquín Campos Acosta, M G Cox, Wei Dong, M. R. Dury, V. R. Gavrilov, Irina Grigoryeva, María Luisa Hernanz, F. Jahan, Boris Khlevnoy, Vladimir B. Khromchenko, D. Lowe, X. Lu, G. Machin, J. M. Mantilla, M. J. Martı́n, H C McEvoy, Bernard Rougié, M. Sadli, S. G. R. Salim, N. Sasajima, D. R. Taubert, A. D. W. Todd, Rafael Van den Bossche, Eric Ham, T. Wang, A. Whittam, Boris Wilthan, D. Woods, John T. Woodward, Yoshiro Yamada, Yu Yamaguchi, Howard W. Yoon, Z. Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Institute for Materials ScienceNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThermodynamic temperatureInflection pointEutectic systemInternational Temperature Scale of 1990Scale of temperatureThermodynamicsMelting pointMelting temperatureMetrologyMaterials scienceTemperature measurementMelting curve analysisChemistryPhysicsMathematicsFixed pointOpticsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermodynamic temperature of the point of inflection of the melting transition of Re-C, Pt-C and Co-C eutectics has been determined to be 2747.84 ± 0.35 K, 2011.43 ± 0.18 K and 1597.39 ± 0.13 K, respectively, and the thermodynamic temperature of the freezing transition of Cu has been determined to be 1357.80 ± 0.08 K, where the ± symbol represents 95% coverage. These results are the best consensus estimates obtained from measurements made using various spectroradiometric primary thermometry techniques by nine different national metrology institutes. The good agreement between the institutes suggests that spectroradiometric thermometry techniques are sufficiently mature (at least in those institutes) to allow the direct realization of thermodynamic temperature above 1234 K (rather than the use of a temperature scale) and that metal-carbon eutectics can be used as high-temperature fixed points for thermodynamic temperature dissemination. The results directly support the developing mise en pratique for the definition of the kelvin to include direct measurement of thermodynamic temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207