MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284660927 · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103476

Variable brain phenotype primarily affects the brainstem and cerebellum in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta caused by recessive <i>WNT1</i> mutations

2015· article· en· W2284660927 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly A. Aldinger, Nancy J. Mendelsohn, Brian HY Chung, Wenjuan Zhang, Daniel H. Cohn, Bridget A. Fernandez, Fowzan S. Alkuraya, William B. Dobyns, Cynthia J. Curry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Genetics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsOsteogenesis imperfectaBrainstemPhenotypeCerebellumGeneticsMutationBiologyMedicineNeuroscienceAnatomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autosomal recessively inherited mutations in WNT1 were recently identified as a cause of severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI).1–6 This finding does not address the critical role of Wnt1 in mid-hindbrain development that is well described in model organisms.7 ,8 Severe intellectual and motor deficits were noted in 4 of 16 families reported to date, but few details were provided. We reviewed developmental outcomes and brain-imaging studies for one new and five previously reported individuals with WNT1-associated OI. All six have brain malformations, with prominent brainstem and cerebellar hypoplasia in five of these six individuals. Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in WNT1 were recently described as a novel cause for severe autosomal-recessive OI in 25 individuals from 16 families in a series of six papers.1–6 Brain-imaging studies in two individuals were reported to show unilateral cerebellar hypoplasia,2 ,4 and another was reported to have Chiari malformation type 1.5 However, only limited data were presented regarding the brain and neurological phenotypes, including only a single MRI image. This is an important issue to address, as the WNT family of secreted signalling proteins play key roles in many developmental and homeostatic processes.9 Indeed, prominent defects in early brain development were described in two mouse lines with Wnt1 mutations long before WNT1 mutations were identified as a cause of bone fragility in humans.7 ,8 To examine the human brain phenotype associated with mutations in WNT1 , we reviewed all available brain-imaging studies from one new and five previously reported individuals including one sibling pair,1–5 which consisted of five brain MRI (figure 1) and one cranial CT scan (see online supplementary figure S1). We found significant malformations in all six individuals (table 1). Hippocampal malformations were found in three affected individuals for whom coronal MRI …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical GeneticsSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207