MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2284728253 · doi:10.1080/19346182.2012.708974

Reliable jump detection for snow sports with low-cost MEMS inertial sensors

2011· article· en· W2284728253 on OpenAlexafffund
Fazle Sadi, Richard Klukas

Bibliographic record

VenueSports Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertial measurement unitStep detectionJumpMicroelectromechanical systemsReliability (semiconductor)AccelerationUnits of measurementSimulationComputer scienceAlgorithmPower (physics)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunicationsMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Body-mounted devices, incorporating low-cost micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), for real-time sports performance feedback are commercially available. In sports such as skiing, snowboarding, and mountain biking, aerial jumps can be detected with these devices and performance variables including air time and jump drop can be calculated real-time. However, the performance of currently used real-time athletic jump detection algorithms using MEMS IMUs is unsatisfactory in terms of accuracy, power efficiency, and reliability. In this paper, a novel algorithm for jump detection with a head-mounted MEMS IMU is proposed. Two novel methods used in this algorithm, namely Windowed Mean Canceled Multiplication and Preceding and Following Acceleration Difference, are introduced. Field experiments are conducted and the results of the proposed algorithm are compared with those of algorithms used in two state-of-the-art sport performance measurement devices. Results demonstrate that the proposed jump detection algorithm comprehensively outperforms these commercial algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSports TechnologySame topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207