MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise training and low dose radiation protect skeletal muscle from high dose radiation

2009· article· en· W2284965457 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael De Lisio, Nghi Phan, Jan Jacek Kaczor, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, Doug Boreham, Gianni Parise

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsOxidative stressCatalaseAntioxidantHormesisEx vivoSkeletal muscleChemistryOxidative phosphorylationReactive oxygen speciesInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation is a lethal, carcinogenic, mutagenic and oxidative stress‐inducing stimulus at high doses (HDR). In low doses (LDR), however, radiation is a hormetic stimulus that protects against oxidative stress by activating cellular defence mechanisms. Exercise training (EX) activates many of the same defence systems, suggesting that EX may be a potent radioprotectant. To examine whether EX could protect skeletal muscle against HDR, we divided mice into four groups (n=16/group): no intervention (SED), EX, LDR, and a group receiving both interventions (ExLDR). A sample of mice from each group received a high dose of radiation (HDR). Markers of oxidative damage, antioxidant enzyme activity and mitochondrial enzyme activity were measured. EX enhanced antioxidant capacity as exhibited by an increase in total, and MnSOD activity which was further increased in response to HDR. LDR did not alter basal antioxidant capacity, however, total, Mn‐, CuZnSOD, and catalase activity all increased in response to HDR. The increase in catalase activity was likely a response to the decreased GPx activity observed in LDR. The mitochondrial enzymes, cytochrome c oxidase and citrate synthase increased activity in EX and LDR following the HDR. Here, we demonstrate the ability of two hormetic stimuli, EX and LDR, to protect skeletal muscle from exposure to a HDR. Funding provided by US DOE (DE‐FG02‐07ER64343) and NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207