Congenital Hypothyroidism: Long-Term Experience with Early and High Levothyroxine Dosage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To assess the management and outcome of the congenital hypothyroidism (CH) patients followed at our institution since the introduction of systemic neonatal screening for CH. STUDY DESIGN: The records of 139 CH patients referred to our center between 1978 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Biochemical and imaging data at diagnosis, initial treatment and growth were analyzed. RESULTS: 111 patients had thyroid dysgenesis (64 ectopy, 46 athyreosis and 1 hypoplasia) and 28 patients had a gland in situ (17 dyshormonogenesis/goiter and 11 normal-sized gland). Levothyroxine treatment was initiated at a median age of 11 days with a mean dose of 11.4 µg/kg/day. Compared to those with ectopy, patients with athyreosis had higher thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and lower thyroxine at diagnosis as well as more delayed bone maturation. Between 1978 and 2014, we observed earlier treatment and earlier TSH normalization. Birth auxology was slightly above the mean of the reference population. Growth at 1 and 6 years and school progression at 11 years were similar to those of the reference population. CONCLUSION: Ectopy is the commonest cause of CH. Children with CH treated early with a mean levothyroxine dose of 11.4 µg/kg/day had a median TSH of 3.07 mU/l at 1 month of age and normal growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".