Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spatial turn in contemporary juridical thought. An introduction This article highlight the plurality of contemporary thought movements that helped bring out, even within the legal culture, the so-called spatial turn. It is provided under interdisciplinary between law & geography and emerges strongly in the last twenty years, first in the United States and Canada and then more recently in Europe. The contribution of Lefebvre and Foucault were eminent even within juridical spatial turn. They mark a turn for the emancipation of category space from its subordination to time and reveal the ambiguity of the use of space which can subscribe fully between the instruments of domination and governmentality but also represents a material or immaterial re-appropriation tool for individual or collective subject. It will be from the 80s, through the iconoclasm of Critical Legal Studies, that the relationship between space and the right re-surfaces with force in parallel with an evidence of indeterminacy and ambiguity of the law. Since then, several works based on an interdisciplinary approach are published and, more recently, the field of the so-called Critical Legal Geography – a real project of interdisciplinary studies – has been developed. Le tournant spatial dans la pansée juridique contemporaine. Une introduction Cette contribution mets en évidence la pluralité des mouvements de la pensée contemporaine qui ont contribue à l’émergence, au sein même de la culture juridique, du spatial turn. Cette tournante est directement lié à ’interdisciplinarité entre le droit et la géographie et a émerge fortement dans les vingt dernières années, d’abord aux États-Unis et au Canada, puis, plus récemment, en Europe. Les analyse de Lefebvre et de Foucault restent centrales mémé pour le tournant spatial dans la légal theory. Ils déterminent un point de non-retour pour l’émancipation de l’espace de sa subordination au temps et au même temps révèlent l’ambiguïté de l’utilisation de l’espace qui peut s’inscrire pleinement parmi les instruments de la domination et de la gouvernamentalité, mais il peut représenter, aussi, outil de réappropriation symbolique et matérielle pour le sujet individuel et collectif. La relation étroite entre l’espace et le droit ré-émergera dans les années ’80, grâce à la puissance iconoclaste de Critical Legal Studies et en parallèle avec la progressive mise en évidence de l’ambiguïté du droit. Depuis de nombreux travaux interdisciplinaires sont publiés et, plus récemment, le domaine de la Critical Legal Geography, véritable projet d’études interdisciplinaires portant sur les interaction entre droit et espace, a été ouvert.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".