MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2285146691

Craton-scale variations in crustal evolution: new insights from Scottish Highland detrital zircon

2010· article· en· W2285146691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Penelope J. Lancaster, Craig Storey, Chris J. Hawkesworth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyZirconHadeanLaurentiaCratonCrustProterozoicArcheanContinental crustGeochemistryEarth scienceBasementCrustal recyclingSedimentary rockProvenancePaleozoicPaleontologyArchaeologyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent work on the evolution of the Earth’s continental crust has focussed on the ability of refractory minerals, such as zircon, to preserve information about crustal units long since lost from the rock record. Techniques used in these studies include U-Pb ages of crystallisation, δ18O to track crustal contamination, and Hf model ages of source rock extraction from the mantle. Such analyses, either alone or in combination, can provide insight into questions on a range of scales, from identifying early recycled material in younger crust, to locating similar (possibly related) source rocks now separated by great distances and investigating whether early crustal production were regional or global in extent. Work on detrital zircons from key areas of Hadean and Early Archaean crust - the Jack Hills (eastern Australia), Acasta Gneiss and Slave Province (Canada) and the Limpopo Belt (southern Africa) - has suggested crustal generation was episodic, with distinct peaks every 0.3-0.6 Ga from 4.5-1.2Ga. Younger sediments from other areas of the world could record many of the same events, and/or identify new ones. One such area is north-west Scotland, which comprises various unconformable Proterozoic and Palaeozoic (meta)sedimentary units that have sampled the underlying basement, and potentially basement from further afield within Laurentia and possibly Baltica. While many studies in other localities have presented combined U-Pb and Hf data to identify episodes of crustal production, the addition of δ18O analyses can distinguish between production of juvenile crust and reworking of pre-existing (sedimentary) material. We present the first correlated in situ U-Pb, δ18O and eHf data from detrital zircons sampled throughout the region, including the Meso- to Neoproterozoic Torridonian and Moine Supergroup and Cambro-Ordovician sediments. These data identify significant juvenile extraction events at c.1.6, c.2.2 and c.3.3Ga, without regard to stratigraphic level. In addition, three zircon crystallisation episodes correspond with the onset of supercontinent stabilisation - Superia, Nuna and Rodinia. The extraction events identified in this study fall between those recognised from older sediments in previous work, suggesting possible differences in the records of crust generation preserved in different terrains. Such differences may be of assistance when tracking continental cratons through the formation and destruction of supercontinents such as Rodinia. These samples also contribute to our understanding of Scottish regional geology, and our ability to correlate these detrital repositories with those in other parts of the world. Previous U-Pb provenance work indicates these Scottish rocks correlate with similar sequences in Greenland and Labrador, Canada, all derived from now-absent units on greater Laurentia. The Scottish data represent the first crustal evolution work of this kind to be undertaken on this significant craton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→