MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geographic Variation of Multiple Paternity in the Common Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis)

2002· article· en· W2285395784 on OpenAlexaffabout
Trenton W. J. Garner, Patrick T. Gregory, Gary F. McCracken, Gordon M. Burghardt, Ben F. Koop, Sylvia E. McLain, R. John Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueCopeia · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThamnophis sirtalisBiologyOffspringLitterReproductionZoologyEcologyGenetic variationGeneticsGenePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis, is the most widely distributed reptile species in North America. Although multiple paternity has been documented in this species, variation in reproduction and ecology suggests that the frequency of occurrence of multiple paternity may vary. We investigated the occurrence of multiple paternity in snakes on Vancouver Island with the following aims: (1) to detect the occurrence of multiple paternity at this location; (2) to determine whether life-history variation and single versus multiple paternity were associated; and (3) to determine whether local rates of multiple paternity differ in comparison to a previous study of this species. Sixteen females and their offspring were analyzed using three highly polymorphic microsatellite loci. Only six of 16 litters showed direct evidence of multiple paternity. Results also showed evidence of a trade-off between offspring size and number of offspring per litter and that females that were multiply mated generally made a higher reproductive investment than females that were singly mated. Rates of multiple paternity in this study and in the previous study differed and were significantly different when litters of fewer than five offspring were eliminated from the analysis. Although we cannot determine the causes of variation in multiple paternity given our data, we suggest two possible mechanisms, one genetic and one ecological, that may lead to different frequencies of multiple fertilizations in this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCopeiaSame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207