Restauración de dos ménsulas gótico-mudéjares, en madera policromada, de la casa del obispo Bedán de Mallorga, Lorca
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Durante el verano del 2009 se ha llevado a cabo la restauracion de dos mensulas de madera policromada que datan del siglo XV y se hallaban depositadas en el Museo Arqueologico Municipal de Lorca. Las piezas presentaban ataque de insectos xilofagos, asi como un ennegrecimiento general que impedia apreciar la calidad de su policromia. Entre otros tratamientos, se ha efectuado una desinsectacion con gases inertes y eliminado meticulosamente las capas de recubrimientos envejecidos que ocultaban los detalles de la policromia. Aprovechando la oportunidad de la restauracion se ha realizado ademas un pequeno estudio de los materiales constituyentes de la pintura, a traves del analisis de cuatro micro-muestras, mediante el cual se ha podido determinar algunos de los pigmentos utilizados y la secuencia de aplicacion de las distintas capas de pintura, claramente apreciable en las estratigrafias microscopicas. En todo momento se ha atendido al proposito de primar tratamientos conservativos y realizar procesos tan poco invasivos como fuera posible, lo que ha llevado finalmente a no realizar reintegracion ninguna, ni volumetrica ni cromatica. El resultado de esta restauracion ha sido muy satisfactorio, ya que se ha paralizado el deterioro producido por xilofagos, y se ha recuperado en buena parte la belleza de colores y motivos decorativos de la policromia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".