Bibliographic record
Abstract
confirmed cases of anthrax Press and general publicFear and misunderstanding of the principles of sterilization and decontamination Do weapons of biological warfare have « Herculean properties » ?Are new or modified disinfection/sterilization procedures needed to kill them?Conventional disinfection and sterilization procedures More than adequate to kill B.anthracis Quick killing results No need to extend sterilizing cycles Normal infection control precautions Adequate to care for « anthrax » patients Do not have spores in biological specimens but vegetative cells Goverment building or post office Same principles of decontamination Application of germicidal agents more difficult (physical logistics) Antibiotic Antibiotic -resistant resistant organisms organisms 12 Antibiotic Antibiotic -resistant resistant organisms organisms & & emerging emerging pathogens pathogens No relationship between Ability to cause serious and fatal infections Resistance to antimicrobial agents used for therapy And Innate resistance to chemical germicides or sterilization No need to change current protocols major exceptions to the rule Clostridium difficile Prions Recent increase of incidence Recent, increase of severity 2003, emergence of a more virulent strain Ribotype O27 High level of toxins From North America to Europe Increase of morbidity Increase of mortality (4 to >13%) Increase length of hospitalization In hospitals, in nursing homes Outbreaks Outbreaks of of C. difficile C. difficile associated associated disease disease Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".