Effect of angiotensin II on calcium reabsorption by the luminal membranes of the nephron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the rat and the rabbit, a number of studies have reported the effects of angiotensin II (ANG II) on Na(+) reabsorption by the proximal (PT) and distal (DT) convoluted tubules of the kidney. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of ANG II on Ca(2+) uptake by the luminal membranes of the PT and DT of the rabbit. Incubation of PT and DT with 10(-12) M ANG II enhanced the initial Ca(2+) uptake in the two segments. Dose-response experiments revealed, for Ca(2+) as well as for Na(+) transport, a biphasic action with a maximal effect at 10(-12) M. Ca(2+) transport by the DT luminal membrane presents a dual kinetic. ANG II action influenced the high-affinity Ca(2+) channel, increasing maximal velocity from 0.72 +/- 0.03 to 0.90 +/- 0.05 pmol x microg(-1) x 10 s(-1) (P < 0.05, n = 3) and leaving the Michaelis-Menten constant unchanged. The effect of ANG II was abolished by losartan, suggesting that the hormone is acting through AT1 receptors. In the PT, calphostin C inhibited the effect of the hormone. It is therefore probable that protein kinase C is involved as a messenger. In the DT, however, neither Rp cAMP, calphostin C, nor econazole (a phospholipase A inhibitor) influenced the hormone action. Therefore, the mechanisms involved in the hormone action remain undetermined. Finally, we questioned whether ANG II acts in the same DT segment as does parathyroid hormone on Ca(2+) transport. The two hormones increased Ca(2+) transport, but their actions were not additive, suggesting that they both influence the same channels in the same segment of the distal nephron, i.e., the segment responsible for the high-affinity calcium channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".