MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2285837568 · doi:10.14288/1.0105645

Cyto-morphological study of Prasiola meridionalis

2011· article· en· W2285837568 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Oyewole Akintobi

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZygoteGameteBiologyPloidyMeiosisSexual reproductionBotanyGametogenesisReproductionFlagellateSomatic cellGerminationSpermThallusCell biologyEmbryoGeneticsEmbryogenesisGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A culture study of the morphology, cytology and life cycle of Prasiola meridionalis was conducted. The alga was grown successfully in Provasoli's culture medium (1958) at a temperature of 5°C, and alternate periods of eight hours of light and sixteen hours of darkness. In culture, gametes are liberated only when mature reproductive or fruiting thalli are first illuminated for two hours with fluorescent light and then kept in the dark for several hours at temperatures of 3°- 5°C. The results of the study have indicated that the life cycle presents a dimorphic alternation of generations. The gametophytic tissue and gametes represent the haploid generation, and the sporophytic tissue and zygote the diploid generation. Meiosis is intermediate in the life cycle, occurring in the adult sporophytic cells. Sixteen chromosomes were observed in the diploid cells, zygote, aplanospores and somatic cells. Sexual reproduction is oogamous. The bi-flagellate micro-gamete is smaller than the macro-gamete which has no flagella. Asexual reproduction is accomplished by germination of aplanospores. Thalli which develop from germination of aplanospores and from zygotes appear the same morphologically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→