MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2286516379 · doi:10.1080/2093761x.2015.1092001

The mechanical characteristics of on-site manufactured compressed earth blocks: the effects of water repellent and other additives

2015· article· en· W2286516379 on OpenAlexafffund
Kenneth Mak, Colin MacDougall, Amir Fam

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCompressive strengthComposite materialMaterials scienceAbsorption of waterCementPortland cementLimeMetakaolinWater contentMoistureGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compressed earth block (CEB) is a form of masonry unit comprised of mechanically compacted earth with a natural clay binder. CEBs typically experience a 50% reduction in compressive strength when saturated. As a result, CEBs are typically stabilised with Portland cement, hydrated lime, or metakaolin. More recently, a commercial silane/siloxane water-repellent admixture with the tradename Plasticure, specifically designed for earth construction, has become available. This paper is an experimental investigation of the influence of Plasticure on the dry and wet strengths of CEBs stabilised with Portland cement, hydrated lime, and metakaolin. Prisms were tested wet and dry with three repetitions each. In total, 106 specimens were tested. The wet specimens were soaked in water for 24 h before compressive testing. Typical CEBs without Plasticure absorbed water equal to 7 to 9% of their original weight. This resulted in reductions of compressive strengths from the dry condition by 40 to 50%. For CEBs that are only stabilised with cement, the addition of Plasticure reduces the amount of water absorbed by 61 to 81% and also reduces moisture-based strength loss by 34 to 71% after 24 h of submersion; this reduces the strength range between dry and wet CEBs drastically. Long-term submersion of cement-stabilised Plasticure specimens (40 days) results in a water absorption of 60% of the absorption measured for CEBs without Plasticure. However, the wet strength is similar to the wet strength of CEBs without Plasticure that are submerged for 24 h. Despite the reduction in strength, all the measured wet compressive strengths exceeded the requirements outlined by Australian, New Mexican and ICC design standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban DevelopmentSame topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207