Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay starts with the Cold War figuration of homosexuals as Communists, and parallels it with the 1930s Communist/socialist accusation of the Nazis/fascists as being homosexual, in order to refute any essentialist connections between homosexuality and either political stance. Instead, an overarching explanation is put forth to encompass both and view them as in effect consisting in the same politics of Othering the enemy in terms of sexuality, which only gets exasperated with the coming of the modern nation. This leads to a theorization of the overdetermined op-positionality between the nation and homosexuality, which is believed to be the real key issue here. However, there are cases (such as Quebec and Canada) in which the relation between the two seems to be not only less tense but rather affirmative-so they are also examined to decide whether they pose a contradiction to the above thesis. Throughout the whole essay, a series of fictional texts are also discussed for illustrations, including Kiss of the Spider Woman, Strawberry and Chocolate, Hosanna, The Moor's Last Sigh, and Dogeaters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".