MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287010702 · doi:10.1042/bss0690001

Functional post-translational proteomics approach to study the role of N-glycans in the development of <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>

2002· review· en· W2287010702 on OpenAlexaff
Harry Schachter, Shihao Chen, Wenli Zhang, Andrew M. Spence, Shaoxian Zhu, John W. Callahan, Don J. Mahuran, Xiaolian Fan, Yi‐Min She, José Cesar Rosa, Vernon N. Reinhold

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Society Symposia · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicStudies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickCanada Research ChairsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaenorhabditis elegansGlycosylationGlycoproteinGlycanBiologyProteomicsCell biologyMutantComputational biologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycosylation is one of the most common post-translational protein modifications. Carbohydrate-mediated interactions between cells and their environment are important in differentiation, embryogenesis, inflammation, cancer and metastasis and other processes. Humans and mice with mutations that prevent normal N-glycosylation show multi-systemic defects in embryogenesis, thereby proving that these molecules are essential for normal development; however, a large number of proteins undergo defective glycosylation in these human and mouse mutants, and it is therefore difficult to determine the precise molecular roles of specific N-glycans on individual proteins. We describe here a 'functional post-translational proteomics' approach that is designed to determine the role of N-glycans on individual glycoproteins in the development of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical Society SymposiaSame topicStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesFrench-language works237,207