MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287033713

Youth Outreach Initiatives at the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives

2010· article· en· W2287033713 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kate Zieman

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachLesbianPolitical scienceSociologyLibrary scienceGovernment (linguistics)HumanitiesGender studiesArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fondées en 1973, les Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives (CLGA) ont continué de grandir pour devenir le deuxième plus grand dépôt d'archives lesbien, gai, bisexuel et transgenre (LGBT) au monde.L'organisation est déménagée récemment dans un nouvel immeuble au coeur du village gai de Toronto et cet événement a occa sionné un accent plus grand sur le rayonnement de l'institution et la programmation publique.En même temps, la parution du rapport du gouvernement de l'Ontario sur les écoles sécuritaires a mené plusieurs écoles publiques à développer des programmes d'éducation pour contrer l'homophobie.Puisque plusieurs enseignants ne sont pas au courant des questions LGBT, ou même à l'aise d'en parler, les CLGA sont bien placées pour devenir une ressource éducative importante.Le comité d'engagement communau taire des CLGA s'est donné la tâche de créer et de donner des communications au sujet de l'histoire LGBT au Canada.Bien que ces communications aient connu beaucoup de succès, le lancement d'une exposition semi-permanente présentée dans les locaux du nouvel immeuble des CLGA pourrait s'avérer une alternative encore plus efficace.ABSTRACT Founded in 1973, the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives has grown to become the second-largest LGBT repository in the world.The organization recently moved to a spacious new facility in the heart of Toronto's gay village, and this has occasioned a new emphasis on public outreach and programming.Concomitantly, the publication of the Government of Ontario's Safe Schools Report has prompted many of the province's public schools to develop anti-homophobia educational programs.Given that many teachers may not be familiar or comfortable with LGBT issues, the CLGA is well-positioned to become a valuable educational resource.The CLGA's Community Engagement Committee has taken on the task of creating and delivering presentations about LGBT history in Canada.While these presentations have been quite successful, a semi-permanent exhibition housed at the CLGA's new location may prove to be a more efficient alternative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0260.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivariaSame topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207