Investigation on Preparation of Mesophase Pitch by the Cocarbonization of Naphthenic Pitch and Polystyrene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two modified pitches with softening points of 70 °C (LPA) and 110 °C (HPA) produced from modification of naphthenic vacuum residue were cocarbonized with polystyrene (PS), respectively, and the mesophase pitches were obtained. The effects of reaction time, PS addition, pressure, and properties of raw materials on cocarbonization behavior were analyzed by H/C, quinoline insoluble content (QI), carbon residue value, density, polarized optical images, X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, and 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) analysis. Comparing with HPA, the cocarbonization process showed more suitable for LPA to prepare the mesophase pitch due to the favorable occurrence of radical chain transfer reactions between LPA and PS components which contributed to the existence of aliphatic side-chains and naphthenic structures in mesogens as well as the formation of a well-developed mesophase pitch. Mesophase pitch with larger domains optical texture and better crystal structure was obtained from cocarbonization with 5 wt % PS under the optimal conditions of 410 °C, 6 h, and 6 MPa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".