MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2287324796 · doi:10.1136/jramc-2015-000550

Ultrasound-assisted external fixation: a technique for austere environments

2015· article· en· W2287324796 on OpenAlexaff
Max Talbot, Edward J. Harvey, Rudy Reindl, Paul A. Martineau, Prism Schneider

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Armed Forces
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFixation (population genetics)SurgeryMedical emergencyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound-assisted external fixation of long bones has the potential to enhance extremity damage control surgery in locations without fluoroscopy, such as forward surgical elements, the intensive care unit, and spacecraft. This pre-clinical study specifically sought to evaluate orthopaedic surgeons' ability to sonographically define fracture patterns and the associated zone of injury in order to improve surgical decision-making and safely insert Schanz pin percutaneously. METHODS: We encased small composite femurs in a cylindrical echogenic gelatin matrix to simulate a human thigh. Three orthopaedic trauma surgeons with no prior ultrasound experience were taught to use sonography to diagnose fractures and assist external fixation. The surgeons were then presented with five specimens in a randomized sequence: three diaphyseal fractures (32-A2, 32-C2 and 32-C3); a distal femur fracture (33-A1.2); and an intact femur, all encased in an opaque black gelatin matrix to blind the participants to the underlying pathology. If they diagnosed a diaphyseal fracture, the surgeons were instructed to insert two Schanz pins proximal and two distal to the fracture, no closer than 40 mm from the fracture edges. RESULTS: Fracture diagnosis and surgical decision-making were correct in all cases. All intact femurs were recognized as such. The need for a knee-spanning external fixator was recognized for all distal femur fractures. The three surgeons performed appropriate ultrasound-assisted pin placement in every case of diaphyseal fracture. The pins adjacent to the fracture site were on average 58 mm (SD ±11 mm) from the edge of the fracture. No pins were inserted in the fracture or in the knee joint. CONCLUSIONS: The current study results suggest that with minimal training, orthopaedic surgeons can use portable ultrasound to diagnose femur fractures, decide the appropriate external fixator configuration, and safely insert Schanz pins outside the zone of injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Army Medical CorpsSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207