On fingering of steam chambers in steam‐assisted heavy oil recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Western Canadian oil sands reservoirs are among the largest petroleum accumulations in the world. Given original oil viscosity up to 5,000,000 mPa‐s, these oils are currently recovered from these reservoirs using steam which heats the oil to ∼250°C with reduced viscosities <10 mPa‐s. A key issue faced by thermal recovery processes is the uniformity of the steam chamber within the reservoir. Nonuniformities of the chamber arise from multiphase flow instabilities in the porous media where fingering has been explained by penetration of low viscosity steam into viscous oil. Here, fine‐grid thermal reservoir simulation reveals that fingering takes place in the gas phase beyond the chamber edge in a zone created by gas exsolution due to elevated temperature beyond the edge of the steam chamber. The results suggest that nonuniform chambers will occur in perfectly homogeneous reservoirs which implies that uniform chambers along wells may be impossible to achieve. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 62: 1364–1381, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".