MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Randomised, double-blind multicentre phase III study of bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): BO17704

2007· article· en· W2287692022 on OpenAlexaff
C. Manegold, Joachim von Pawel, Petr Zatloukal, Rodryg Ramlau, Vera Gorbounova, Victor J. Hirsch, Natasha B. Leighl, J. Mezger, V.R. Archer, Martin Reck

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGemcitabineCarboplatinBevacizumabClinical endpointPlaceboOncologyCisplatinChemotherapyLung cancerProgression-free survivalNeutropeniaSurgeryRandomized controlled trialPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA7514 Background: The ECOG 4599 phase III trial demonstrated that the addition of bevacizumab (B) to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved overall and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC [Sandler et al. NEJM 2006]. Cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) is a common combination in regions outside of the US. Methods: This randomised, placebo-controlled phase III study compared two doses of B plus CG versus CG plus placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints include overall survival, response rate (RR) and safety. Eligibility criteria: histologically or cytologically documented previously untreated advanced or recurrent non- squamous NSCLC; ECOG PS 0–1; no brain metastases. Between 2/05 and 8/06 1,043 pts were randomised to: C 80mg/m 2 on d1 and G 1,250mg/m 2 on d1 and d8 every 3 wks for up to 6 cycles plus B continued to progression at 7.5mg/kg every 3 wks, or 15mg/kg every 3 wks or placebo. The study was designed to include the number of patients required to observe a 30% reduction in the risk of a PFS event in the B arms compared with control using a two-sided logrank test (a=2.5%) with 80% power. Results: PFS was significantly prolonged as analysed both in a primary analysis (without censoring for non-protocol anti-neoplastic therapy [NPT] prior to progression) and in a prespecified analysis with censoring for NPT. The RR and response duration were also increased. Overall survival is immature due to short duration of follow up. Conclusions: Both doses of B significantly improved PFS and RR, consistent with the results of the earlier phase III trial E4599. No unexpected safety signals were detected. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.413 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations167
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207