MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2287723120

L’Avant-projet de loi sur le développement durable du Québec (Quebec Draft Bill on Sustainable Development)

2006· article· fr· W2287723120 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paule Halley

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French Abstract: La presentation du Plan de developpement durable du Quebec et de l’Avant-projet de loi sur le developpement durable represente une etape importante de la strategie provinciale destinee a changer les facons de faire du gouvernement afin de mieux concilier les actions et les politiques publiques avec les imperatifs du developpement durable. L’auteure examine le programme du gouvernement du Quebec et les nouveaux regimes juridiques introduits par l’Avant-projet de loi sur le developpement durable. Cette reforme comporte un cadre et une procedure pour l’elaboration et le suivi d’une strategie gouvernementale destinee a la mise en œuvre du developpement durable, une verification des progres realises par un commissaire au developpement durable independant, l’introduction, dans la Charte des droits et libertes de la personne du Quebec, d’un nouveau droit de la personne a un environnement sain et respectueux de la biodiversite et, enfin, la creation d’un fonds vert. L’auteure propose une reflexion sur les principaux elements du debat entourant l’adoption de ces nouveaux regimes juridiques.English Abstract: The presentation of the Quebec Sustainable Development Plan and the draft bill on sustainable development represents an important step in the provincial strategy to change the manner in which government functions in order to better reconcile government action and politics with the imperatives of sustainable development. The author examines the program of the Quebec government and the new legal regime introduced by the draft bill on sustainable development. This reform includes a framework and procedure for the elaboration and monitoring of a government strategy designed to implement sustainable development, a verification procedure to follow the progress achieved by the creation of an independent sustainable development commissioner, the introduction, in the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, of a new human right to a healthy environment that is respectful of biodiversity, and, finally, the creation of a green fund. The author reflects on the principal elements of the debate surrounding the adoption of these legal regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→