A computational study of hybrid approaches of metaheuristic algorithms for the cell formation problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we solve the 0–1 cell formation problem where the number of cells is fixed a priori and where the objective is to maximize the overall efficiency of a production system by grouping together machines providing service to similar parts into a subsystem (denoted cell). Three different methods are introduced and compared numerically. The first local search method is an implementation of simulated annealing (SA) where the definition of the neighbourhood is specific to the application and requires using a diversification and intensification strategies. The second local search method is an adaptive simulated annealing method where the neighbourhood is selected randomly at each iteration. The procedure is adaptive in the sense that the probability of selecting a neighbourhood is updated during the process. The third method is a hybrid method (HM) of a population-based method and a local search method. To improve the solution obtained with HM, we apply a SA method afterward. The best variants are very efficient to solve the 35 benchmark problems commonly used in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it