Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the genomes and chromosomes of spider monkeys (Primates: Atelidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterochromatin distribution and chromosomal rearrangements have been proposed as the main sources of karyotype differences among species of Neotropical primates. This variability suggests that there could be differences at other smaller-scale levels of DNA organization as well. In particular, quantitative differences between genomes result from gains and losses of individual DNA segments, and may result in varying genome sizes (C-values) among species. In this work, we studied the genomes of 23 individuals from four species in the genus Ateles (Primates: Platyrrhini): A. chamek, A. paniscus, A. belzebuth, and A. geoffroyi. We analyzed genome size and its relationship with the presence of chromosomal rearrangements and patterns of heterochromatin distribution. The C-value presented in this work for Ateles chamek is the first estimate for this species (3.09 ± 0.23 pg), whereas our estimates for A. belzebuth (2.88 ± 0.06 pg) and A. geoffroyi (3.19 ± 0.24 pg) differed from those previously published. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and interspecies comparativegenomic hybridization (iCGH) analyses revealed that differences in genome size among species relate to localized blocks in both heterochromatic and euchromatic regions, the latter of which appear to be genetically unstable. There were also quantitative differences in Y chromosome content. It remains to be seen whether the chromosomal characteristics of Ateles here discussed are common to platyrrhine monkeys, but it is clear that these monkeys exhibit some intriguing genomic features worthy of additional exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".