MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Femoral neck anteversion: an orthopaedic evaluation between multi‐regional populations

2009· article· en· W2288144998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeffrey S. Schachar, Daniel Charubhumi, Samuel Márquez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFEMORAL CONDYLEFemurMedicineTrochanterFemoral neckAnatomyCoronal planeOrthodonticsSurgeryInternal medicineOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Femoral neck anteversion (FNA) varies with age, sex, and ontogenetic growth pattern. This study examined African (Af), European (E), and two Asian groups, one of which, an Inuit (I) population from osteological collections of the American Museum of Natural History. FNA is the angular difference between proximal and distal ends of the bone. A line was drawn in the coronal plane through the lateral and medial femoral condyles. A second line was drawn from the greater trochanter to the head of the femur, through the center of the femoral neck. The intersection forms the anteversion angle. Selecting only male and right femurs controlled for the confounding variables of sex and asymmetries. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between E and I groups and between Af and I groups. Average anteversion angle for the Af group was 15.7 degrees, 11.1 for the E group, 33.4 for the I group, and 23.0 for the Asian group. Developmentally, the amount of FNA is 40 degrees at birth, decreasing to ~15 degrees at maturity. The study revealed that the I sample presented with the largest angle, displaying excessive femoral torsion. Femoral torsion is viewed symptomatically as in‐toeing, which usually corrects without treatment as the child matures. Our results suggest that the Inuit sample may not have undergone the physiologic torsion reduction of 25 degrees as seen in the other representative samples. Grant Funding Source N/A

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207