MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288342709

Plant Succession on the Ruby Gulch Waste Rock Repository Cap in the Northern Black Hills of South Dakota

2008· article· en· W2288342709 on OpenAlex
Andrew C. Korth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcological successionArchaeologyGeologyGeographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 32-ha Ruby Gulch Waste Rock Repository was created in 2001 to sequester heavy metal- and acid-generating rock exposed by past gold mining at Gilt Edge Mine in the northern Black Hills. Repository construction included the placement of a polyethylene membrane and a geotextile over waste rock to protect Ruby Gulch, a tributary of Strawberry Creek, from contaminated drainage. The membrane and geotextile were then covered with approximately 46 cm of drain rock, 76 cm of rocky subsoil and 15 cm of topsoil. The repository cap, comprised of ten erodible, 30-percent slopes and two plateaus, was seeded with a grass-forb mixture in 2003. The purpose of this study was to assess successional trends and long term sustainability of the vegetation established on the cap. Canopy cover, basal cover, and species diversity were measured annually in fifty-six 1-m2 permanent plots and along twenty, 20-m permanent transects. Ocular estimations of cover by species were recorded for all 56, 1-m2 plots and 200, regularly spaced 0.25-m2 microplots (IO per transect). An 8-point frame was used every 0.8 m along each transect to determine ground surface cover (200 points per transect/4000 points total). Data from 2005, 2006 and 2007 indicated a decrease in species richness, including a decline in broad-leaved plants (especially clovers, Trifolium spp.), and a near disappearance ofthickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus). A few species remained stable, including western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), Canada wildrye (Elymus canadensis), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus), and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). However, intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium), hard fescue (Festuca brevipila) and sheep fescue (Festuca ovina) significantly increased over the years. Severe drought and a grasshopper outbreak in 2006 appeared to accelerate compositional change between 2005 and 2006. Analyses of point frame data indicated an increase in vegetative ground cover as a result of significant increases in fescue, Kentucky bluegrass and litter. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) ordination of transect cover data indicated increasing similarity in vegetative cover between sampling sites over the three years. Likewise, the cluster analysis based on each year's permanent plot data demonstrated successional change with greater similarities among plots, resulting in fewer but larger groups over time. The results indicated long-term sustainability of vegetation with adequate cover to ensure erosion protection on the cap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it