MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288380844 · doi:10.1155/2012/769891

Collaboration – No Other Way to Go

2012· article· en· W2288380844 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robin G. McFadden

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Respiratory Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsCanadian Thoracic Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R espiratory disease is ubiquitous and does not take on a single form or affect a select population.The burden of respiratory disease is experienced all over the world, by young and old.If we expect to have an impact on respiratory health, we cannot go it alone -and we don't.The Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) has a wide range of partnerships that enables it to maximize its impact in strategic areas (research, education, guidelines and knowledge translation).In addition to collaborating with the Canadian Lung Association, the Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals, the Canadian COPD Alliance, and provincial lung associations and thoracic societies, the CTS works with a wide range of stakeholders and organizations, in Canada and abroad.Only a few years ago, we welcomed a national group of pediatric respirologists who formed a pediatric assembly (PA) within the CTS.Since then, we've been working on integrating their perspective by appointing pediatric respirologists to many of our committees, creating a pediatric track as part of the Canadian Respiratory Conference (CRC) and including the PA chair (currently Dr Hans Pasterkamp) in our meetings with American Thoracic Society (ATS) leaders.We collaborate a great deal with our counterparts in the United States and Europe.We meet regularly with American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the ATS and European Respiratory Society leaders to exchange information on a wide range of respiratory issues and to plan our collaboration on specific initiatives.Current joint projects include the following: North American collaboration on World Spirometry Day; the development of joint guidelines on acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with the ACCP; the delivery of our annual CTS Scientific Program in conjunction with the ACCP CHEST Conference; our collaboration on scientific presentations at conferences such at the CRC and the World Asthma Congress; the delivery of the CTS Research Poster Competition as part of the ATS's annual international conference; and the CTS/ European Respiratory Society Peter Macklem Fellowship exchange program.We will also soon celebrate the inauguration of our own Darcy Marciniuk, a former CTS president, as ACCP president -that is quite a testament to our collaboration on the North American stage!We are also actively involved in global initiatives such as the Guidelines International Network and the Global Alliance Against Respiratory Disease.We have been well represented there by senior CTS leaders including Louis-Philippe Boulet, Chair of the Canadian Respiratory Guidelines Network.Our partnerships extend all the way to our Journal.Thanks to the leadership of Peter Paré, Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Respiratory Journal, we are developing memoranda of understanding with the Canadian Critical Care Society and the Canadian Sleep Society.Through these agreements, we aim to address a wider range of clinical and research issues in the Journal and, thus, enhance the content and readership of the Canadian Respiratory Journal.Last, but certainly not least, are the partnerships we are nurturing through the National Respiratory Research Strategy (NRRS).Our Faculties of Medicine and division directors from across the country, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research -Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health, and AllerGen have been some of the key

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.021
Scholarly communication0.0270.052
Open science0.0070.059
Research integrity0.0300.043
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Respiratory JournalSame topicInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207