MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288466769

ESTILOS DEL SENTIDO DEL HUMOR. UN ESTUDIO TRANSCULTURAL EN POBLACIÓN ADULTA SEGÚN GÉNERO

2006· article· es· W2288466769 on OpenAlex
Alicia Cayssials, Ana D ́Anna, Marcelo Antonio Pérez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueXIII Jornadas de Investigación y Segundo Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del Mercosur · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicHumor Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense of humorHumanitiesPsychologyArtSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durante el siglo pasado se realizaron numerosos intentos para evaluar el sentido del humor. Martin y colaboradores (2003) han teorizado acerca de cuatro estilos del humor: Afiliativo, Mejoramiento personal, Agresividad y Descalificacion personal y han creado varios instrumentos para medir las diferencias en cuanto al sentido del humor. En el presente trabajo se presentan los datos hallados a partir de la adaptacion del Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) en la Universidad de Buenos Aires. En el estudio participaron 800 sujetos de entre 22 y 60 anos (media 38; desvio 10); 50% mujeres y 50% varones. Se analizan los diferentes estilos del humor teniendo en cuenta las diferencias halladas segun genero y los resultadossecomparanconlosobtenidosenunamuestracanadiense y otra libanesa. En las tres muestras los varones presentaron puntuaciones mas elevadas que las mujeres en los estilos Agresivo y Descalificacion Personal. Se hallaron diferencias entre las muestras en los estilos Afiliativo y Mejoramiento Personal. Palabras clave Sentido humor Psicologia Transcultural ABSTRACT THE HUMOR STYLES. A STUDY CROSS CULTURAL WITH ADULTS Throughout the 20th century there were numerous attempts to develop measures of a sense of humor. According to Rod Martin and his colleagues´ s approach (2003) were four styles: Afiliative, Self-enhangcing, Aggressive and Self-defeating scales. The present work presents data about measures of The Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ), which was adaptated and applied to an argentinian sample of 800 subjects (50% female; 50% male; mean age=38, SD=10). This adaptation will be useful for research on humor and psychological well-being by assessing forms of humor that may be deleterious to health as well as those that are beneficial. We studied the sex differences and compare these scores with the Canadian and Lebanon samples. Males scored higher tan females on Aggressive and Self-defeating humor in all samples. There are differences between samples on Affiliative and Selfenhanching humor. Key words Sense humor Cross-cultural Psychology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it