MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2288571829 · doi:10.14288/1.0071142

Mechanisms underlying the epileptic phenotype associated with the alpha-1 A322D mutation in the GABA-A receptor

2010· article· en· W2288571829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clarrisa A. Bradley

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutationPhenotypeEpilepsyGeneticsNeuroscienceAlpha (finance)ReceptorBiologyPsychologyGeneDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder with a strong hereditary component. A mutation in the α1 subunit (A322D) of the GABA-A receptor is responsible for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in a large Canadian family. Previous work has identified that this mutation affects the function of GABA-A receptors, expressed in HEK293 cells. Here I have examined the underlying mechanisms of this dysfunction and shown that the mutation reduces the cell surface expression of the GABA-A receptor, promotes association with the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone calnexin, enhances degradation and accelerates the degradation rate of the subunits approximately 2.5 fold. I have also found that the mutation causes the receptor to be degraded by a lysosomal-dependent process. Furthermore, I find that the mutation results in receptors that are inserted into the plasma membrane but are more rapidly endocytosed by a dynamin and caveolin-dependent mechanism. These results suggest that the mutant subunit can form trafficking-competent receptors that have a shorter lifetime on the plasma membrane. Collectively, my results strongly implicate defects in both the biogenesis and trafficking of the GABA-A receptors, as part of the mechanistic basis for the epileptic phenotype observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→