Frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 producing T lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with systemic sclerosis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The pathophysiology of the lung fibrotic process in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is not fully elucidated. Since this pattern represents the leading cause of death in SSc, the knowledge of its actual pathophysiology is basic to prevent and stage pulmonary damage. In this study, we aimed to further investigate the relationship between the functional profiles of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) T cells and the pulmonary manifestation of the disease. METHODS: With this aim, we assessed the frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 producing T-lymphocytes and their effector cytokines in BAL of SSc patients without signs or symptoms of lung interstitial involvement (SScFib-) and with interstitial lung fibrosis (SScFib+). We also study as control groups: patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), patients with sarcoidosis and 9 healthy controls (NHCs). RESULTS: SScFib- showed an increase in BAL Th1/Th2 balance compared to NHCs, which was even higher than that observed in sarcoidosis. SScFib+ showed a shift towards a lower Th1/Th2 ratio as compared to SScFib-. The frequency of Th17 BAL T cells did not change among study groups. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm the Th1/Th2 imbalance hypothesis on the pathogenesis of interstitial fibrosis in SSc patients, and suggest a possible utility in the assessment of BAL Th1/Th2 ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".