A Unique Case of Bilateral High Ulnar Nerve Laceration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High ulnar nerve injuries are now commonly treated with a distal nerve transfer, in which the anterior interosseuos nerve to pronator quadratus is coapted to the deep ulnar nerve motor branch. Herein, the authors describe a case of bilateral ulnar nerve laceration that provides an opportunity to directly compare two operative techniques on different extremities of the same patient. The patient sustained bilateral ulnar nerve injuries 6 cm superior to the medial epicondyle. The right ulnar nerve was proximally repaired with primary neurorraphy and a distal motor nerve transfer. The left ulnar nerve underwent primary nuerorraphy without a nerve transfer because the median nerve was mistakenly tied off to control bleeding. Physical examination and nerve conduction studies two years postsurgical intervention demonstrated an undeniable difference in cosmesis and function. The clinical findings suggest a superior result with a combined primary neurorraphy and a distal nerve transfer compared with a primary neurorraphy alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".