MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2288656535 · doi:10.1111/jnc.13541

Prion protein in exosomes: partnering Aβ peptides and driving fibrilization

2016· letter· en· W2288656535 on OpenAlexafffund
Vilma R. Martins, Marco A. M. Prado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsNeurotoxicityMicrovesiclesInternalizationFibrilAmyloid (mycology)ChemistryAmyloid betaCell biologyPrion proteinBiochemistryBiologyPeptideDiseaseMedicineToxicitymicroRNAPathologyCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

image This Editorial highlights a study by Falker and coworkers in which the authors expanded the notion of how prion protein (PrPC) can be involved with the neurotoxicity promoted by Aβ oligomers, the most toxic component in Alzheimer's Disease. While confirming that PrPC is secreted from cells in exosomes, they showed that at the surface of these vesicles PrPC is capable of binding to dimeric up to pentameric, oligomeric Aβ42, and Aβ42 fibrils. In addition, by binding to diverse oligomeric Aβ42 components, exosomal PrPC accelerated Aβ42 fibrilization leading to decrease in the neurotoxicity mediated by Aβ42 as well as Aβ42 internalization. These data suggest an opportunity to design new therapeutic compounds for Alzheimer's disease. Read the highlighted article ‘Exosomal cellular prion protein drives fibrillization of amyloid beta and counteracts amyloid beta‐mediated neurotoxicity’ on page 88 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0180.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207